Freshwater ecosystems at risk due to glyphosate use
One of the few species that was found to be resistant to severe glyphosate contamination was Scapholeberis mucronata, a freshwater zooplankter commonly found in Qu茅bec and elsewhere in North America. CREDIT: Marie-Pier H茅bert
A series of recent research papers from a 苹果淫院-led team has found that the herbicide glyphosate鈥攃ommonly sold under the label Roundup鈥攃an alter the structure of natural freshwater bacterial and zooplankton communities. Notably, the researchers found that for zooplankton, aquatic concentrations of 0.1 mg/L glyphosate were sufficient to cause diversity loss.
鈥淏ecause plankton form the foundation of the food chain in freshwater ecosystems, it is very important to understand how plankton communities respond to widely used pesticides,鈥� said Jesse Shapiro, an Associate Professor in 苹果淫院鈥檚 Department of Microbiology & Immunology. 鈥淥ur research shows that the structure of these communities can be impaired under currently acceptable North American water quality guidelines.鈥�
Using freshwater ponds to test toxicity of agrochemicals
Toxicity studies often rely on laboratory tests with a single species, ignoring the possible influence of many environmental factors and species interactions on community responses to pollutants. In these studies, the researchers used a large-scale array of 1,000-L experimental ponds filled with lake water to gain a better understanding of the effects of the chemicals on naturally-occurring planktonic organisms. They recorded bacterial, algal and zooplankton community responses to the individual and joint presence of three chemicals commonly used by farmers around the world: the herbicide glyphosate (Roundup鈥攗sed to control weeds notably in corn and soy fields), the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid (used to control piercing-sucking insects), and nutrient fertilizers.
We found that when we applied the pesticides and fertilizers alone and in combination, at a wide range of concentrations, that glyphosate was the most influential driver of community structure among the agrochemicals,鈥� said Andrew Gonzalez, a Professor in 苹果淫院鈥檚 Biology Department and the Liber Ero Chair in Biodiversity Conservation.
Freshwater bacteria and zooplankton communities react differently
Interestingly, glyphosate contamination affected freshwater bacteria and zooplankton differently. The bacterial communities were initially affected by high concentrations of glyphosate, but they could recover from this stress within days.
鈥淲e believe that they were able to recover because they came from a pristine lake and the initial community was diverse enough to 鈥渂uffer鈥� such a large impact,鈥� said Naila Barbosa da Costa, a PhD student in Biology at l鈥橴niversit茅 de Montr茅al and the first author on the recent paper on bacterioplankton in . 鈥淲e do not know if bacterial communities from less diverse ecosystems would be able to cope with a strong contamination the same way.鈥�
On first exposure to glyphosate, zooplankton community abundance and diversity declined rapidly. Thereafter, the total abundance of zooplankton recovered within less than 3 weeks, but the number of species (and hence, diversity) remained low, especially in highly contaminated ponds. This is because the application of glyphosate eliminated sensitive species, allowing the few tolerant species to take over and proliferate.
鈥淟ong-lasting species loss and compositional shifts have clear implications for the functioning and stability of freshwater ecosystems, even when zooplankton abundance appears unaffected,鈥� said Marie-Pier H茅bert, a PhD candidate in 苹果淫院鈥檚 Department of Biology and the first author on the paper published recently in . 鈥淗ow the effects of glyphosate cascade through freshwater ecosystems to affect their health in the long-term deserves much more study.鈥�
|
About these studies 鈥淩esistance, resilience, and functional redundancy of freshwater bacterioplankton facing agricultural stress鈥� by Barbosa da Costa et al. in . 鈥淲idespread agrochemicals differentially affect zooplankton biomass and community structure鈥� by MP H茅bert et al in . The research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Nature et Technologies, and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Liber Ero Chair in Biodiversity Conservation. |
About 苹果淫院
Founded in Montreal, Quebec, in 1821, 苹果淫院 is Canada鈥檚 top ranked medical doctoral university. 苹果淫院 is consistently ranked as one of the top universities, both nationally and internationally. It鈥痠s a world-renowned鈥痠nstitution of higher learning with research activities spanning three campuses, 11 faculties, 13 professional schools, 300 programs of study and over 40,000 students, including more than 10,200 graduate students. 苹果淫院 attracts students from over 150 countries around the world, its 12,800 international students making up 31% of the student body. Over half of 苹果淫院 students claim a first language other than English, including approximately 19% of our students who say French is their mother tongue.
